Loading…
Loading…
Your MCP server connects AI agents to your entire business. Is it locked down?
Bachao.AI audits Model Context Protocol servers for exposed tools, weak auth, privilege escalation, and prompt injection paths that reach your databases, files, and APIs.
Tool definitions, authentication, indirect injection, and data leakage — every MCP attack surface tested.
Every tool exposed by your MCP server is reviewed for overprivileged parameter access, missing input validation, and unintended capabilities that could be abused by a manipulated AI agent.
MCP server authentication mechanisms are tested for weak tokens, missing rate limits, unauthenticated tool calls, and session handling vulnerabilities.
Tool responses that return user-controlled content are tested as indirect prompt injection vectors. A malicious database record or API response can hijack agent behaviour.
Test whether your MCP server leaks sensitive data — internal file paths, database schemas, system architecture details, or user PII — through tool response content or error messages.
Submit, audit, test, harden — 48 hours from config to report.
Provide your MCP server schema file, tool definitions, and transport configuration. Bachao.AI maps every tool, parameter, and data access path.
Each tool is reviewed for principle of least privilege violations — tools that expose more access than their stated purpose requires are flagged with specific remediation.
Authentication mechanisms and tool response content are tested for weak tokens, unauthenticated endpoints, and indirect prompt injection vectors from third-party or user data.
A prioritised finding report with OWASP LLM Top 10 mapping, severity ratings, and code-level fix suggestions is delivered within 48 hours.
Generic penetration testing has no tooling for MCP-specific attack vectors.
| Generic VAPT | Bachao.AI | |
|---|---|---|
| Tool permission review | Not covered | Every tool audited for least-privilege violations |
| Indirect injection testing | Not applicable | Tool responses tested as injection vectors |
| Auth testing | Generic auth checks | MCP-specific token, rate-limit, and session tests |
| Data leakage | App-layer only | Error messages, schemas, file paths, PII in responses |
| Framework mapping | CERT-In only | OWASP LLM07/LLM08 + MITRE ATLAS + CERT-In |
| Turnaround | 2–4 weeks | 48 hours (standard) / 5 days (complex multi-server) |
Every MCP Server Security engagement is scoped to your actual attack surface — no flat subscription that pretends every project is the same. Our automated approach typically costs materially less than traditional VAPT providers for equivalent coverage.
Start with a free scan → see your risk profile → discuss scope → get a quote that fits your project.
For SMEs and startups who need a credible security report for their board or compliance checklist.
For Series A+ companies and NBFCs who need continuous monitoring and a DPDP / CERT-In compliant report.
For large organisations and CISOs who need full-scope testing and a board-ready compliance audit trail.
Scope discussed on a free 15-min call · No commitment required
Everything you need to know about MCP server security testing.
Model Context Protocol (MCP) is an open standard that allows AI agents (like Claude, GPT-4o) to connect to external tools and data sources — file systems, databases, APIs, calendars. An MCP server defines what tools are available and how they're called. A vulnerable MCP server can give an AI agent — or an attacker who manipulates the agent — unintended access to your systems.
We test for: unauthenticated tool access, overprivileged tool parameters (e.g. a read tool that can actually write), indirect prompt injection via tool responses, sensitive data exposure in error messages, tool name confusion attacks, and missing rate limiting on expensive tool calls.
No. For most audits, you provide your MCP server configuration file (schema and tool definitions) and we conduct a whitebox review. For dynamic testing, we set up an isolated test environment — we never run attack payloads against production.
A standard MCP server audit — covering tool definitions, auth, and prompt injection paths — takes 48 hours from submission to report. Complex multi-server or custom transport configurations may take up to 5 business days.
MCP security standards are still emerging. Bachao.AI tracks Anthropic's MCP security guidelines, OWASP LLM Top 10 (which covers tool-use attacks), and NIST AI RMF. Our reports map findings to these frameworks alongside CERT-In compliant documentation.
Bachao.AI covers your entire security surface — from code to cloud to compliance.
Free first review covers tool inventory and permission audit. Full review extends to injection-vector scanning, auth hardening, and code-level fix suggestions — delivered in 48 hours.